Most of us are swimming around in a sea of desire, believing that we float alone in our search for love. Nothing is further from the truth. Rather we’re swimming in the midst of an ocean of others, all of whom believe themselves to be autonomous searchers for Ultimate Reality. Much modern spirituality is aimed at discovering this empowering sense of autonomy, the Self Source behind our apparent individuality. And yet, does such an isolated and all-powerful Self exist? If so, is it as autonomous as we first imagine?
The ‘dark-matter’ of our being appears to be a mysterious psycho-spiritual substance known as desire – in other words the insatiable energy that drives us towards what we want. Does this desire spring from our autonomy, from our individual heart or is it birthed out of a much more subtle, all-encompassing source; the inter-connected matrix of desire. In this series of blog posts I hope to examine this hidden ocean in which we sail our little boats of individuality.
Let’s start with the idea of desire itself. Are our desires our own? Contrary to popular opinion I believe not. Our desire centres within are receptors of desire and not its womb. In other words we ‘pick up’ or are infected with the desire of others, from the cradle to the grave. Each of us receives and subsequently transmits the desire of ‘others’ like some highly efficient multi-media server in cyber-space. We’re not as much a ‘one off’ as we like to believe but part of something much bigger – the human desire project.
In this post let’s examine a simple model of how such a desire transference works in practice. All desire has an object. We want something or someone. Desire without an object isn’t truly desire but a weak imitation. Let’s take the example of personal relationships.
A popular student has his eye on a beautiful girl whom he’d love to date. This guy has himself unsurprisingly a group of secret admirers within his male classmates. He’s a model, one whom they aspire to be. He has everything; good looks, a great sense of humour, a sharp intellect, sporting prowess etc. As one of these male ‘fans’ observes his pursuit of the young lady in question something begins to stir within his ‘savage breast’ viz. desire.
Wishing to be like his model, the aspiring suitor begins his ‘own’ campaign of conquest to win the affection of the dream-girl object. At first his efforts are inconsequential compared to those of his idealised hero. Yet curiously over time the model begins to sense that he’s no longer alone in his ‘romantic’ pursuit; a rival has now appeared for the beauty’s much sought affections. Something must be done – an intensification of his efforts, for after all she is ‘meant’ to be his. Consequentially his ‘fan’ rival also steps up a gear, subliminally morphing into the desire likeness of his model idol. The ‘model’ student has transformed into a model-obstacle in the eyes of his previous admirer.
At a highly significant point in time something dramatically game-changing takes place. The girl is no longer the goal or object of the young men’s mutual desire. Their eyes have been taken off her to focus instead on each other. The fight for the beauty and the power involved has now possessed the warring students as they seek to ‘defeat’ each other in the struggle. The two rivals have now become model obstacles for each other – warring doubles in the desire battle. A seasoned neutral observer no longer sees the superiority of one candidate but comes to the undeniable conclusion that the two competitors have become clones of one another – ‘monstrous doubles’ caught up in mutual fascination game. Rather than looking at the previously desired object, the pair cannot take their ‘psychic’ eyes of each other as one moment of relaxed weakness could spell psychic defeat.
The fight descends further into relational chaos as nobody wants to lose. Losing such a ‘life and death’ encounter would lead to the destruction of the ego’s sense of Self, built up and strengthened during the fight. The bitter fruit of absorbed or imitative desire has well and truly been tasted – relational chaos and potential violence.
We have now arrived at the scenario described in many strands of mythical literature; warring brothers or twins. Is it any wonder that ‘twins’ are taboo in many native cultures? The ancestral fathers clearly understood the inherent danger of such rivalling mirror images and their potential for violent contagion.
I believe that we live in the dynamic flux of such desire transfer in our human relationships. No-one is averse to being hooked by the insidious mechanism of absorbed desire. No psychic settings safeguard us from such subliminal infection. Family, friends, work colleagues and particularly master-disciple spiritual relationships all lie within such a matrix of desire. Is it any wonder that many of our model based relationships burst asunder?
How can we tell if we’re presently suffering from a case of the ‘model-obstacles’?
Thankfully, language comes to our rescue!
Is anyone ‘getting under your skin’?
Yes!
Then you are.
Does someone ‘really annoy’ you?
Then you are.
Can we be freed from the intensity of such destructive fascinations?
Thankfully yes!
I hope to tackle the psyche’s liberation from skewed or mimetic desire in forthcoming posts.

